Correlation Between Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Income

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Income at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Income into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Aggressive Growth Allocation and Fidelity Income Replacement, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Income and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Aggressive Growth with a short position of Fidelity Income. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Income.

Diversification Opportunities for Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Income

0.17

Correlation Coefficient

Aggressive Growth  Fidelity Income

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Aggressive and Fidelity is 0.17. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Aggressive Growth Allocation and Fidelity Income Replacement in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fidelity Income Repl and Aggressive Growth is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Aggressive Growth Allocation are associated (or correlated) with Fidelity Income. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fidelity Income Repl has no effect on the direction of Aggressive Growth i.e., Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Income go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Income

Assuming the 90 days horizon Aggressive Growth Allocation is expected to generate 1.79 times more return on investment than Fidelity Income. However, Aggressive Growth is 1.79 times more volatile than Fidelity Income Replacement. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fidelity Income Replacement is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,141  in Aggressive Growth Allocation on September 19, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  34.00  from holding Aggressive Growth Allocation or generate 2.98% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Aggressive Growth Allocation  vs.  Fidelity Income Replacement

Aggressive Growth

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Aggressive Growth Allocation are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Aggressive Growth is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Fidelity Income Repl

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Fidelity Income Replacement has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Fidelity Income is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Income

The main advantage of trading using opposite Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Income positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Aggressive Growth position performs unexpectedly, Fidelity Income can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fidelity Income will offset losses from the drop in Fidelity Income's long position.

The idea behind Aggressive Growth Allocation and Fidelity Income Replacement pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world.