Correlation Between Fast Retailing and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fast Retailing and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fast Retailing and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fast Retailing Co and The Goldman Sachs, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fast Retailing and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fast Retailing with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fast Retailing and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Fast Retailing and Goldman Sachs

0.33
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Fast and Goldman is 0.33. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fast Retailing Co and The Goldman Sachs in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs and Fast Retailing is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fast Retailing Co are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs has no effect on the direction of Fast Retailing i.e., Fast Retailing and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Fast Retailing and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Fast Retailing is expected to generate 1.32 times less return on investment than Goldman Sachs. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Fast Retailing Co is 1.59 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about 0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Goldman Sachs is currently generating about 0.15 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  47,347  in The Goldman Sachs on October 6, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  8,563  from holding The Goldman Sachs or generate 18.09% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy97.5%
ValuesDaily Returns

Fast Retailing Co  vs.  The Goldman Sachs

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Fast Retailing 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fast Retailing Co are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain basic indicators, Fast Retailing may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.
Goldman Sachs 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in The Goldman Sachs are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Goldman Sachs reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Fast Retailing and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Fast Retailing and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Fast Retailing and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fast Retailing position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Fast Retailing Co and The Goldman Sachs pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.

Other Complementary Tools

Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules