Correlation Between Franklin Templeton and Franklin Servative

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Franklin Templeton and Franklin Servative at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Franklin Templeton and Franklin Servative into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Franklin Templeton Smacs and Franklin Servative Allocation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Franklin Templeton and Franklin Servative and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Franklin Templeton with a short position of Franklin Servative. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Franklin Templeton and Franklin Servative.

Diversification Opportunities for Franklin Templeton and Franklin Servative

0.72

Correlation Coefficient

Franklin Templeton  Franklin Servative

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Franklin and Franklin is 0.72. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Franklin Templeton Smacs and Franklin Servative Allocation in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Franklin Servative and Franklin Templeton is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Franklin Templeton Smacs are associated (or correlated) with Franklin Servative. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Franklin Servative has no effect on the direction of Franklin Templeton i.e., Franklin Templeton and Franklin Servative go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Franklin Templeton and Franklin Servative

Assuming the 90 days horizon Franklin Templeton is expected to generate 144.5 times less return on investment than Franklin Servative. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Franklin Templeton Smacs is 2.1 times less risky than Franklin Servative. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Franklin Servative Allocation is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,392  in Franklin Servative Allocation on October 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  7.00  from holding Franklin Servative Allocation or generate 0.5% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Franklin Templeton Smacs  vs.  Franklin Servative Allocation

Franklin Templeton Smacs

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Franklin Templeton Smacs are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical indicators, Franklin Templeton is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Franklin Servative

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Franklin Servative Allocation are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Franklin Servative is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Franklin Templeton and Franklin Servative

The main advantage of trading using opposite Franklin Templeton and Franklin Servative positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Franklin Templeton position performs unexpectedly, Franklin Servative can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Franklin Servative will offset losses from the drop in Franklin Servative's long position.

The idea behind Franklin Templeton Smacs and Franklin Servative Allocation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.