Correlation Between Fisher Paykel and National Australia

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fisher Paykel and National Australia at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fisher Paykel and National Australia into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fisher Paykel Healthcare and National Australia Bank, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fisher Paykel and National Australia and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fisher Paykel with a short position of National Australia. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fisher Paykel and National Australia.

Diversification Opportunities for Fisher Paykel and National Australia

0.17
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Fisher and National is 0.17. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fisher Paykel Healthcare and National Australia Bank in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on National Australia Bank and Fisher Paykel is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fisher Paykel Healthcare are associated (or correlated) with National Australia. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of National Australia Bank has no effect on the direction of Fisher Paykel i.e., Fisher Paykel and National Australia go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Fisher Paykel and National Australia

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Fisher Paykel Healthcare is expected to under-perform the National Australia. In addition to that, Fisher Paykel is 6.48 times more volatile than National Australia Bank. It trades about -0.04 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. National Australia Bank is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  10,286  in National Australia Bank on September 16, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  74.00  from holding National Australia Bank or generate 0.72% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Fisher Paykel Healthcare  vs.  National Australia Bank

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Fisher Paykel Healthcare 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Fisher Paykel Healthcare has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable technical indicators, Fisher Paykel is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
National Australia Bank 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in National Australia Bank are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, National Australia is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Fisher Paykel and National Australia Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Fisher Paykel and National Australia

The main advantage of trading using opposite Fisher Paykel and National Australia positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fisher Paykel position performs unexpectedly, National Australia can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in National Australia will offset losses from the drop in National Australia's long position.
The idea behind Fisher Paykel Healthcare and National Australia Bank pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Aroon Oscillator module to analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities