Correlation Between Foxx Development and Lululemon Athletica

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Foxx Development and Lululemon Athletica at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Foxx Development and Lululemon Athletica into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Foxx Development Holdings and Lululemon Athletica, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Foxx Development and Lululemon Athletica and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Foxx Development with a short position of Lululemon Athletica. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Foxx Development and Lululemon Athletica.

Diversification Opportunities for Foxx Development and Lululemon Athletica

-0.76
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Foxx and Lululemon is -0.76. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Foxx Development Holdings and Lululemon Athletica in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Lululemon Athletica and Foxx Development is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Foxx Development Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Lululemon Athletica. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Lululemon Athletica has no effect on the direction of Foxx Development i.e., Foxx Development and Lululemon Athletica go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Foxx Development and Lululemon Athletica

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Foxx Development Holdings is expected to under-perform the Lululemon Athletica. In addition to that, Foxx Development is 3.13 times more volatile than Lululemon Athletica. It trades about -0.02 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Lululemon Athletica is currently generating about 0.08 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  30,481  in Lululemon Athletica on September 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  7,461  from holding Lululemon Athletica or generate 24.48% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Foxx Development Holdings  vs.  Lululemon Athletica

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Foxx Development Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Foxx Development Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.
Lululemon Athletica 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Lululemon Athletica are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain essential indicators, Lululemon Athletica unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Foxx Development and Lululemon Athletica Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Foxx Development and Lululemon Athletica

The main advantage of trading using opposite Foxx Development and Lululemon Athletica positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Foxx Development position performs unexpectedly, Lululemon Athletica can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Lululemon Athletica will offset losses from the drop in Lululemon Athletica's long position.
The idea behind Foxx Development Holdings and Lululemon Athletica pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.

Other Complementary Tools

Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm