Correlation Between Four Leaf and CLST Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Four Leaf and CLST Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Four Leaf and CLST Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Four Leaf Acquisition and CLST Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Four Leaf and CLST Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Four Leaf with a short position of CLST Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Four Leaf and CLST Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for Four Leaf and CLST Holdings

-0.41
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Four and CLST is -0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Four Leaf Acquisition and CLST Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on CLST Holdings and Four Leaf is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Four Leaf Acquisition are associated (or correlated) with CLST Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of CLST Holdings has no effect on the direction of Four Leaf i.e., Four Leaf and CLST Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Four Leaf and CLST Holdings

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Four Leaf is expected to generate 63.86 times less return on investment than CLST Holdings. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Four Leaf Acquisition is 227.19 times less risky than CLST Holdings. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. CLST Holdings is currently generating about 0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3.99  in CLST Holdings on September 18, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (3.28) from holding CLST Holdings or give up 82.21% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Four Leaf Acquisition  vs.  CLST Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Four Leaf Acquisition 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Four Leaf Acquisition are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite persistent basic indicators, Four Leaf is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price mess, may contribute to short-term losses for the institutional investors.
CLST Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in CLST Holdings are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly weak technical indicators, CLST Holdings demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Four Leaf and CLST Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Four Leaf and CLST Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite Four Leaf and CLST Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Four Leaf position performs unexpectedly, CLST Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in CLST Holdings will offset losses from the drop in CLST Holdings' long position.
The idea behind Four Leaf Acquisition and CLST Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Dashboard module to portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges