Correlation Between Financials Ultrasector and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Financials Ultrasector and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Financials Ultrasector and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Financials Ultrasector Profund and Goldman Sachs Clean, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Financials Ultrasector and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Financials Ultrasector with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Financials Ultrasector and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Financials Ultrasector and Goldman Sachs

-0.9
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Financials and Goldman is -0.9. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Financials Ultrasector Profund and Goldman Sachs Clean in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Clean and Financials Ultrasector is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Financials Ultrasector Profund are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Clean has no effect on the direction of Financials Ultrasector i.e., Financials Ultrasector and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Financials Ultrasector and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Financials Ultrasector Profund is expected to generate 1.45 times more return on investment than Goldman Sachs. However, Financials Ultrasector is 1.45 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs Clean. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Clean is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,888  in Financials Ultrasector Profund on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  742.00  from holding Financials Ultrasector Profund or generate 19.08% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Financials Ultrasector Profund  vs.  Goldman Sachs Clean

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Financials Ultrasector 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Financials Ultrasector Profund are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Financials Ultrasector showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Goldman Sachs Clean 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Clean has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's technical and fundamental indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.

Financials Ultrasector and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Financials Ultrasector and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Financials Ultrasector and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Financials Ultrasector position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Financials Ultrasector Profund and Goldman Sachs Clean pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Share Portfolio module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets