Correlation Between MicroSectors FANG and FT Cboe

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both MicroSectors FANG and FT Cboe at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining MicroSectors FANG and FT Cboe into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between MicroSectors FANG Index and FT Cboe Vest, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on MicroSectors FANG and FT Cboe and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in MicroSectors FANG with a short position of FT Cboe. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of MicroSectors FANG and FT Cboe.

Diversification Opportunities for MicroSectors FANG and FT Cboe

0.86
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between MicroSectors and DAUG is 0.86. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding MicroSectors FANG Index and FT Cboe Vest in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on FT Cboe Vest and MicroSectors FANG is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on MicroSectors FANG Index are associated (or correlated) with FT Cboe. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of FT Cboe Vest has no effect on the direction of MicroSectors FANG i.e., MicroSectors FANG and FT Cboe go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between MicroSectors FANG and FT Cboe

Given the investment horizon of 90 days MicroSectors FANG Index is expected to generate 12.17 times more return on investment than FT Cboe. However, MicroSectors FANG is 12.17 times more volatile than FT Cboe Vest. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. FT Cboe Vest is currently generating about 0.12 per unit of risk. If you would invest  40,490  in MicroSectors FANG Index on October 7, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  20,974  from holding MicroSectors FANG Index or generate 51.8% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

MicroSectors FANG Index  vs.  FT Cboe Vest

 Performance 
       Timeline  
MicroSectors FANG Index 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in MicroSectors FANG Index are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively conflicting technical and fundamental indicators, MicroSectors FANG unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
FT Cboe Vest 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in FT Cboe Vest are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, FT Cboe is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

MicroSectors FANG and FT Cboe Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with MicroSectors FANG and FT Cboe

The main advantage of trading using opposite MicroSectors FANG and FT Cboe positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if MicroSectors FANG position performs unexpectedly, FT Cboe can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in FT Cboe will offset losses from the drop in FT Cboe's long position.
The idea behind MicroSectors FANG Index and FT Cboe Vest pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Companies Directory module to evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation