Correlation Between Fidelity Natural and Materials Portfolio

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fidelity Natural and Materials Portfolio at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fidelity Natural and Materials Portfolio into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fidelity Natural Resources and Materials Portfolio Materials, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fidelity Natural and Materials Portfolio and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fidelity Natural with a short position of Materials Portfolio. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fidelity Natural and Materials Portfolio.

Diversification Opportunities for Fidelity Natural and Materials Portfolio

0.78
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Fidelity and Materials is 0.78. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fidelity Natural Resources and Materials Portfolio Materials in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Materials Portfolio and Fidelity Natural is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fidelity Natural Resources are associated (or correlated) with Materials Portfolio. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Materials Portfolio has no effect on the direction of Fidelity Natural i.e., Fidelity Natural and Materials Portfolio go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Fidelity Natural and Materials Portfolio

Assuming the 90 days horizon Fidelity Natural Resources is expected to under-perform the Materials Portfolio. In addition to that, Fidelity Natural is 1.33 times more volatile than Materials Portfolio Materials. It trades about -0.12 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Materials Portfolio Materials is currently generating about -0.12 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  10,202  in Materials Portfolio Materials on September 9, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (184.00) from holding Materials Portfolio Materials or give up 1.8% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Fidelity Natural Resources  vs.  Materials Portfolio Materials

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Fidelity Natural Res 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fidelity Natural Resources are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Fidelity Natural is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Materials Portfolio 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Materials Portfolio Materials are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Materials Portfolio is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Fidelity Natural and Materials Portfolio Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Fidelity Natural and Materials Portfolio

The main advantage of trading using opposite Fidelity Natural and Materials Portfolio positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fidelity Natural position performs unexpectedly, Materials Portfolio can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Materials Portfolio will offset losses from the drop in Materials Portfolio's long position.
The idea behind Fidelity Natural Resources and Materials Portfolio Materials pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Holdings module to check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing.

Other Complementary Tools

Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements