Correlation Between Fidelity New and Wilmington Multi-manager

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fidelity New and Wilmington Multi-manager at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fidelity New and Wilmington Multi-manager into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fidelity New Millennium and Wilmington Multi Manager Real, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fidelity New and Wilmington Multi-manager and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fidelity New with a short position of Wilmington Multi-manager. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fidelity New and Wilmington Multi-manager.

Diversification Opportunities for Fidelity New and Wilmington Multi-manager

-0.06
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Fidelity and Wilmington is -0.06. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fidelity New Millennium and Wilmington Multi Manager Real in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Wilmington Multi-manager and Fidelity New is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fidelity New Millennium are associated (or correlated) with Wilmington Multi-manager. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Wilmington Multi-manager has no effect on the direction of Fidelity New i.e., Fidelity New and Wilmington Multi-manager go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Fidelity New and Wilmington Multi-manager

Assuming the 90 days horizon Fidelity New Millennium is expected to generate 1.33 times more return on investment than Wilmington Multi-manager. However, Fidelity New is 1.33 times more volatile than Wilmington Multi Manager Real. It trades about 0.29 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Wilmington Multi Manager Real is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,678  in Fidelity New Millennium on September 11, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  740.00  from holding Fidelity New Millennium or generate 13.03% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Fidelity New Millennium  vs.  Wilmington Multi Manager Real

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Fidelity New Millennium 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

22 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fidelity New Millennium are ranked lower than 22 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak essential indicators, Fidelity New may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Wilmington Multi-manager 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Wilmington Multi Manager Real are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Wilmington Multi-manager is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Fidelity New and Wilmington Multi-manager Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Fidelity New and Wilmington Multi-manager

The main advantage of trading using opposite Fidelity New and Wilmington Multi-manager positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fidelity New position performs unexpectedly, Wilmington Multi-manager can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Wilmington Multi-manager will offset losses from the drop in Wilmington Multi-manager's long position.
The idea behind Fidelity New Millennium and Wilmington Multi Manager Real pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.

Other Complementary Tools

Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm