Correlation Between Total Return and Infrastructure Fund

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Total Return and Infrastructure Fund at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Total Return and Infrastructure Fund into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Total Return Bond and Infrastructure Fund Adviser, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Total Return and Infrastructure Fund and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Total Return with a short position of Infrastructure Fund. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Total Return and Infrastructure Fund.

Diversification Opportunities for Total Return and Infrastructure Fund

0.66
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Total and Infrastructure is 0.66. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Total Return Bond and Infrastructure Fund Adviser in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Infrastructure Fund and Total Return is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Total Return Bond are associated (or correlated) with Infrastructure Fund. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Infrastructure Fund has no effect on the direction of Total Return i.e., Total Return and Infrastructure Fund go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Total Return and Infrastructure Fund

Assuming the 90 days horizon Total Return is expected to generate 1.45 times less return on investment than Infrastructure Fund. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Total Return Bond is 2.79 times less risky than Infrastructure Fund. It trades about 0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Infrastructure Fund Adviser is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,364  in Infrastructure Fund Adviser on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  36.00  from holding Infrastructure Fund Adviser or generate 1.52% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Total Return Bond  vs.  Infrastructure Fund Adviser

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Total Return Bond 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Total Return Bond are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Total Return is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Infrastructure Fund 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Infrastructure Fund Adviser are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Infrastructure Fund is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Total Return and Infrastructure Fund Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Total Return and Infrastructure Fund

The main advantage of trading using opposite Total Return and Infrastructure Fund positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Total Return position performs unexpectedly, Infrastructure Fund can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Infrastructure Fund will offset losses from the drop in Infrastructure Fund's long position.
The idea behind Total Return Bond and Infrastructure Fund Adviser pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Managers module to screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios