Correlation Between Fidelity Growth and Litman Gregory

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fidelity Growth and Litman Gregory at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fidelity Growth and Litman Gregory into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fidelity Growth Income and Litman Gregory Masters, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fidelity Growth and Litman Gregory and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fidelity Growth with a short position of Litman Gregory. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fidelity Growth and Litman Gregory.

Diversification Opportunities for Fidelity Growth and Litman Gregory

0.59
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Fidelity and Litman is 0.59. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fidelity Growth Income and Litman Gregory Masters in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Litman Gregory Masters and Fidelity Growth is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fidelity Growth Income are associated (or correlated) with Litman Gregory. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Litman Gregory Masters has no effect on the direction of Fidelity Growth i.e., Fidelity Growth and Litman Gregory go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Fidelity Growth and Litman Gregory

Assuming the 90 days horizon Fidelity Growth Income is expected to under-perform the Litman Gregory. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Fidelity Growth Income is 1.08 times less risky than Litman Gregory. The mutual fund trades about -0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Litman Gregory Masters is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,794  in Litman Gregory Masters on December 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  102.00  from holding Litman Gregory Masters or generate 5.69% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Fidelity Growth Income  vs.  Litman Gregory Masters

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Fidelity Growth Income 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Fidelity Growth Income has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Fidelity Growth is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Litman Gregory Masters 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litman Gregory Masters are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong essential indicators, Litman Gregory is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Fidelity Growth and Litman Gregory Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Fidelity Growth and Litman Gregory

The main advantage of trading using opposite Fidelity Growth and Litman Gregory positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fidelity Growth position performs unexpectedly, Litman Gregory can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Litman Gregory will offset losses from the drop in Litman Gregory's long position.
The idea behind Fidelity Growth Income and Litman Gregory Masters pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the FinTech Suite module to use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity