Correlation Between First Foundation and Metropolitan Bank

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both First Foundation and Metropolitan Bank at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining First Foundation and Metropolitan Bank into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between First Foundation and Metropolitan Bank Holding, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on First Foundation and Metropolitan Bank and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in First Foundation with a short position of Metropolitan Bank. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of First Foundation and Metropolitan Bank.

Diversification Opportunities for First Foundation and Metropolitan Bank

0.49

Correlation Coefficient

First Foundation  Metropolitan Bank

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between First and Metropolitan is 0.49. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding First Foundation and Metropolitan Bank Holding in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Metropolitan Bank Holding and First Foundation is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on First Foundation are associated (or correlated) with Metropolitan Bank. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Metropolitan Bank Holding has no effect on the direction of First Foundation i.e., First Foundation and Metropolitan Bank go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between First Foundation and Metropolitan Bank

Given the investment horizon of 90 days First Foundation is expected to under-perform the Metropolitan Bank. In addition to that, First Foundation is 1.39 times more volatile than Metropolitan Bank Holding. It trades about -0.1 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Metropolitan Bank Holding is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  5,933  in Metropolitan Bank Holding on December 22, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (420.00) from holding Metropolitan Bank Holding or give up 7.08% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

First Foundation  vs.  Metropolitan Bank Holding

First Foundation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days First Foundation has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain very healthy which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The recent disarray may also be a sign of long period up-swing for the firm investors.

Metropolitan Bank Holding

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Metropolitan Bank Holding has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong fundamental indicators, Metropolitan Bank is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with First Foundation and Metropolitan Bank

The main advantage of trading using opposite First Foundation and Metropolitan Bank positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if First Foundation position performs unexpectedly, Metropolitan Bank can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Metropolitan Bank will offset losses from the drop in Metropolitan Bank's long position.

The idea behind First Foundation and Metropolitan Bank Holding pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bond Analysis module to evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios..