Correlation Between Franklin Emerging and Mfs Global

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Franklin Emerging and Mfs Global at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Franklin Emerging and Mfs Global into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Franklin Emerging Market and Mfs Global Alternative, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Franklin Emerging and Mfs Global and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Franklin Emerging with a short position of Mfs Global. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Franklin Emerging and Mfs Global.

Diversification Opportunities for Franklin Emerging and Mfs Global

0.94
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Franklin and Mfs is 0.94. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Franklin Emerging Market and Mfs Global Alternative in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Global Alternative and Franklin Emerging is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Franklin Emerging Market are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Global. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Global Alternative has no effect on the direction of Franklin Emerging i.e., Franklin Emerging and Mfs Global go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Franklin Emerging and Mfs Global

Assuming the 90 days horizon Franklin Emerging is expected to generate 1.93 times less return on investment than Mfs Global. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Franklin Emerging Market is 1.32 times less risky than Mfs Global. It trades about 0.22 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Global Alternative is currently generating about 0.32 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,297  in Mfs Global Alternative on December 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  66.00  from holding Mfs Global Alternative or generate 5.09% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Franklin Emerging Market  vs.  Mfs Global Alternative

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Franklin Emerging Market 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Franklin Emerging Market are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Franklin Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Mfs Global Alternative 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mfs Global Alternative are ranked lower than 25 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Mfs Global is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Franklin Emerging and Mfs Global Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Franklin Emerging and Mfs Global

The main advantage of trading using opposite Franklin Emerging and Mfs Global positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Franklin Emerging position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Global can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Global will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Global's long position.
The idea behind Franklin Emerging Market and Mfs Global Alternative pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Cryptocurrency Center module to build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency.

Other Complementary Tools

Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets