Correlation Between FactSet Research and RBC Bearings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both FactSet Research and RBC Bearings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining FactSet Research and RBC Bearings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between FactSet Research Systems and RBC Bearings Incorporated, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on FactSet Research and RBC Bearings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in FactSet Research with a short position of RBC Bearings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of FactSet Research and RBC Bearings.

Diversification Opportunities for FactSet Research and RBC Bearings

0.86
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between FactSet and RBC is 0.86. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding FactSet Research Systems and RBC Bearings Incorporated in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on RBC Bearings and FactSet Research is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on FactSet Research Systems are associated (or correlated) with RBC Bearings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of RBC Bearings has no effect on the direction of FactSet Research i.e., FactSet Research and RBC Bearings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between FactSet Research and RBC Bearings

Considering the 90-day investment horizon FactSet Research is expected to generate 1.9 times less return on investment than RBC Bearings. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, FactSet Research Systems is 1.32 times less risky than RBC Bearings. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. RBC Bearings Incorporated is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  21,311  in RBC Bearings Incorporated on September 19, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  9,901  from holding RBC Bearings Incorporated or generate 46.46% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

FactSet Research Systems  vs.  RBC Bearings Incorporated

 Performance 
       Timeline  
FactSet Research Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in FactSet Research Systems are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable fundamental indicators, FactSet Research is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
RBC Bearings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in RBC Bearings Incorporated are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental drivers, RBC Bearings may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

FactSet Research and RBC Bearings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with FactSet Research and RBC Bearings

The main advantage of trading using opposite FactSet Research and RBC Bearings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if FactSet Research position performs unexpectedly, RBC Bearings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in RBC Bearings will offset losses from the drop in RBC Bearings' long position.
The idea behind FactSet Research Systems and RBC Bearings Incorporated pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Earnings Calls module to check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities