Correlation Between Franklin Credit and Royalty Management

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Franklin Credit and Royalty Management at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Franklin Credit and Royalty Management into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Franklin Credit Management and Royalty Management Holding, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Franklin Credit and Royalty Management and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Franklin Credit with a short position of Royalty Management. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Franklin Credit and Royalty Management.

Diversification Opportunities for Franklin Credit and Royalty Management

0.38
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Franklin and Royalty is 0.38. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Franklin Credit Management and Royalty Management Holding in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Royalty Management and Franklin Credit is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Franklin Credit Management are associated (or correlated) with Royalty Management. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Royalty Management has no effect on the direction of Franklin Credit i.e., Franklin Credit and Royalty Management go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Franklin Credit and Royalty Management

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Franklin Credit Management is expected to generate 3.88 times more return on investment than Royalty Management. However, Franklin Credit is 3.88 times more volatile than Royalty Management Holding. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Royalty Management Holding is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  11.00  in Franklin Credit Management on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1.00) from holding Franklin Credit Management or give up 9.09% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Franklin Credit Management  vs.  Royalty Management Holding

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Franklin Credit Mana 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Franklin Credit Management are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very uncertain basic indicators, Franklin Credit displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Royalty Management 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Royalty Management Holding are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very fragile fundamental indicators, Royalty Management may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2025.

Franklin Credit and Royalty Management Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Franklin Credit and Royalty Management

The main advantage of trading using opposite Franklin Credit and Royalty Management positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Franklin Credit position performs unexpectedly, Royalty Management can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Royalty Management will offset losses from the drop in Royalty Management's long position.
The idea behind Franklin Credit Management and Royalty Management Holding pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.

Other Complementary Tools

Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity