Correlation Between Fidelity California and Goldman Sachs

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fidelity California and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fidelity California and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fidelity California Municipal and Goldman Sachs Small, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fidelity California and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fidelity California with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fidelity California and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Fidelity California and Goldman Sachs

0.53

Correlation Coefficient

Fidelity California  Goldman Sachs

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Fidelity and Goldman is 0.53. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fidelity California Municipal and Goldman Sachs Small in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Small and Fidelity California is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fidelity California Municipal are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Small has no effect on the direction of Fidelity California i.e., Fidelity California and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Fidelity California and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Fidelity California is expected to generate 17.47 times less return on investment than Goldman Sachs. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Fidelity California Municipal is 4.66 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Small is currently generating about 0.14 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,625  in Goldman Sachs Small on October 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  80.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Small or generate 3.05% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	94.74%
Values	Daily Returns

Fidelity California Municipal  vs.  Goldman Sachs Small

Fidelity California

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Weak

Over the last 90 days Fidelity California Municipal has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Fidelity California is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs Small

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Small has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Fidelity California and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Fidelity California and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fidelity California position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.

The idea behind Fidelity California Municipal and Goldman Sachs Small pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Suggestion module to get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios.