Correlation Between Fidelity California and Mfs Emerging

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fidelity California and Mfs Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fidelity California and Mfs Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fidelity California Municipal and Mfs Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fidelity California and Mfs Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fidelity California with a short position of Mfs Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fidelity California and Mfs Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Fidelity California and Mfs Emerging

0.41

Correlation Coefficient

Fidelity California  Mfs Emerging

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Fidelity and Mfs is 0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fidelity California Municipal and Mfs Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Emerging Markets and Fidelity California is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fidelity California Municipal are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Fidelity California i.e., Fidelity California and Mfs Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Fidelity California and Mfs Emerging

Assuming the 90 days horizon Fidelity California Municipal is expected to generate 0.78 times more return on investment than Mfs Emerging. However, Fidelity California Municipal is 1.29 times less risky than Mfs Emerging. It trades about -0.32 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Emerging Markets is currently generating about -0.34 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,243  in Fidelity California Municipal on October 10, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (22.00) from holding Fidelity California Municipal or give up 1.77% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Fidelity California Municipal  vs.  Mfs Emerging Markets

Fidelity California

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Fidelity California Municipal has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Fidelity California is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Mfs Emerging Markets

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Mfs Emerging Markets has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong essential indicators, Mfs Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Fidelity California and Mfs Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Fidelity California and Mfs Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fidelity California position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Emerging's long position.

The idea behind Fidelity California Municipal and Mfs Emerging Markets pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Analysis module to research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities.