Correlation Between FAT Brands and Dine Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both FAT Brands and Dine Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining FAT Brands and Dine Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between FAT Brands and Dine Brands Global, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on FAT Brands and Dine Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in FAT Brands with a short position of Dine Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of FAT Brands and Dine Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for FAT Brands and Dine Brands

0.02
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between FAT and Dine is 0.02. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding FAT Brands and Dine Brands Global in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Dine Brands Global and FAT Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on FAT Brands are associated (or correlated) with Dine Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Dine Brands Global has no effect on the direction of FAT Brands i.e., FAT Brands and Dine Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between FAT Brands and Dine Brands

Assuming the 90 days horizon FAT Brands is expected to generate 0.72 times more return on investment than Dine Brands. However, FAT Brands is 1.39 times less risky than Dine Brands. It trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Dine Brands Global is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,285  in FAT Brands on September 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (320.00) from holding FAT Brands or give up 24.9% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

FAT Brands  vs.  Dine Brands Global

 Performance 
       Timeline  
FAT Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in FAT Brands are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively invariable fundamental drivers, FAT Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.
Dine Brands Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Dine Brands Global are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy forward indicators, Dine Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

FAT Brands and Dine Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with FAT Brands and Dine Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite FAT Brands and Dine Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if FAT Brands position performs unexpectedly, Dine Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Dine Brands will offset losses from the drop in Dine Brands' long position.
The idea behind FAT Brands and Dine Brands Global pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios