Correlation Between Ford and Gaming Corps

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ford and Gaming Corps at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ford and Gaming Corps into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ford Motor and Gaming Corps AB, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ford and Gaming Corps and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ford with a short position of Gaming Corps. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ford and Gaming Corps.

Diversification Opportunities for Ford and Gaming Corps

0.22

Correlation Coefficient

Ford  Gaming Corps

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Ford and Gaming is 0.22. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ford Motor and Gaming Corps AB in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Gaming Corps AB and Ford is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ford Motor are associated (or correlated) with Gaming Corps. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Gaming Corps AB has no effect on the direction of Ford i.e., Ford and Gaming Corps go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ford and Gaming Corps

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Ford Motor is expected to generate 0.53 times more return on investment than Gaming Corps. However, Ford Motor is 1.89 times less risky than Gaming Corps. It trades about -0.23 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Gaming Corps AB is currently generating about -0.25 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,080  in Ford Motor on September 22, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (92.00) from holding Ford Motor or give up 8.52% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	95.45%
Values	Daily Returns

Ford Motor  vs.  Gaming Corps AB

Ford Motor

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Ford Motor has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest unfluctuating performance, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain stable and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-run gains for the company stockholders.

Gaming Corps AB

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Gaming Corps AB has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Pair Trading with Ford and Gaming Corps

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ford and Gaming Corps positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ford position performs unexpectedly, Gaming Corps can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Gaming Corps will offset losses from the drop in Gaming Corps' long position.

The idea behind Ford Motor and Gaming Corps AB pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Managers module to screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world.