Correlation Between Entravision Communications and Spectrum Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Entravision Communications and Spectrum Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Entravision Communications and Spectrum Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Entravision Communications and Spectrum Brands Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Entravision Communications and Spectrum Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Entravision Communications with a short position of Spectrum Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Entravision Communications and Spectrum Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for Entravision Communications and Spectrum Brands

0.02
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Entravision and Spectrum is 0.02. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Entravision Communications and Spectrum Brands Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Spectrum Brands Holdings and Entravision Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Entravision Communications are associated (or correlated) with Spectrum Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Spectrum Brands Holdings has no effect on the direction of Entravision Communications i.e., Entravision Communications and Spectrum Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Entravision Communications and Spectrum Brands

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Entravision Communications is expected to generate 4.15 times more return on investment than Spectrum Brands. However, Entravision Communications is 4.15 times more volatile than Spectrum Brands Holdings. It trades about -0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Spectrum Brands Holdings is currently generating about -0.17 per unit of risk. If you would invest  240.00  in Entravision Communications on October 26, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (12.50) from holding Entravision Communications or give up 5.21% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Entravision Communications  vs.  Spectrum Brands Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Entravision Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Entravision Communications are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather weak basic indicators, Entravision Communications may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.
Spectrum Brands Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Spectrum Brands Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Spectrum Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Entravision Communications and Spectrum Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Entravision Communications and Spectrum Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite Entravision Communications and Spectrum Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Entravision Communications position performs unexpectedly, Spectrum Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Spectrum Brands will offset losses from the drop in Spectrum Brands' long position.
The idea behind Entravision Communications and Spectrum Brands Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Channel module to use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk