Correlation Between Energizer Holdings and Chardan NexTech

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Energizer Holdings and Chardan NexTech at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Energizer Holdings and Chardan NexTech into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Energizer Holdings and Chardan NexTech Acquisition, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Energizer Holdings and Chardan NexTech and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Energizer Holdings with a short position of Chardan NexTech. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Energizer Holdings and Chardan NexTech.

Diversification Opportunities for Energizer Holdings and Chardan NexTech

-0.08
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Energizer and Chardan is -0.08. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Energizer Holdings and Chardan NexTech Acquisition in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Chardan NexTech Acqu and Energizer Holdings is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Energizer Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Chardan NexTech. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Chardan NexTech Acqu has no effect on the direction of Energizer Holdings i.e., Energizer Holdings and Chardan NexTech go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Energizer Holdings and Chardan NexTech

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Energizer Holdings is expected to under-perform the Chardan NexTech. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Energizer Holdings is 11.49 times less risky than Chardan NexTech. The stock trades about -0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Chardan NexTech Acquisition is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1.40  in Chardan NexTech Acquisition on December 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.50  from holding Chardan NexTech Acquisition or generate 35.71% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Energizer Holdings  vs.  Chardan NexTech Acquisition

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Energizer Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Energizer Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with inconsistent performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain relatively invariable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest agitation may also be a sign of long-running up-swing for the enterprise retail investors.
Chardan NexTech Acqu 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Chardan NexTech Acquisition are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly inconsistent forward indicators, Chardan NexTech showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Energizer Holdings and Chardan NexTech Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Energizer Holdings and Chardan NexTech

The main advantage of trading using opposite Energizer Holdings and Chardan NexTech positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Energizer Holdings position performs unexpectedly, Chardan NexTech can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Chardan NexTech will offset losses from the drop in Chardan NexTech's long position.
The idea behind Energizer Holdings and Chardan NexTech Acquisition pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the My Watchlist Analysis module to analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like.

Other Complementary Tools

Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets