Correlation Between Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Energizer Holdings with a short position of Colgate Palmolive. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive.

Diversification Opportunities for Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive

-0.27

Correlation Coefficient

Energizer Holdings  Colgate Palmolive

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Energizer and Colgate is -0.27. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Colgate Palmolive and Energizer Holdings is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Energizer Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Colgate Palmolive. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Colgate Palmolive has no effect on the direction of Energizer Holdings i.e., Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Energizer Holdings is expected to under-perform the Colgate Palmolive. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Energizer Holdings is 1.17 times less risky than Colgate Palmolive. The stock trades about -0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Colgate Palmolive is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  9,028  in Colgate Palmolive on December 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  291.00  from holding Colgate Palmolive or generate 3.22% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Energizer Holdings  vs.  Colgate Palmolive

Energizer Holdings

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Energizer Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with inconsistent performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain relatively invariable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest agitation may also be a sign of long-running up-swing for the enterprise retail investors.

Colgate Palmolive

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Colgate Palmolive are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite persistent essential indicators, Colgate Palmolive is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price mess, may contribute to short-term losses for the institutional investors.

Pair Trading with Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive

The main advantage of trading using opposite Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Energizer Holdings position performs unexpectedly, Colgate Palmolive can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Colgate Palmolive will offset losses from the drop in Colgate Palmolive's long position.

The idea behind Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.