Correlation Between Enbridge H and Maple Leaf

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Enbridge H and Maple Leaf at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Enbridge H and Maple Leaf into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Enbridge H Cum and Maple Leaf Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Enbridge H and Maple Leaf and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Enbridge H with a short position of Maple Leaf. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Enbridge H and Maple Leaf.

Diversification Opportunities for Enbridge H and Maple Leaf

-0.47
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Enbridge and Maple is -0.47. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Enbridge H Cum and Maple Leaf Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Maple Leaf Foods and Enbridge H is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Enbridge H Cum are associated (or correlated) with Maple Leaf. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Maple Leaf Foods has no effect on the direction of Enbridge H i.e., Enbridge H and Maple Leaf go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Enbridge H and Maple Leaf

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Enbridge H Cum is expected to generate 0.26 times more return on investment than Maple Leaf. However, Enbridge H Cum is 3.88 times less risky than Maple Leaf. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Maple Leaf Foods is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,993  in Enbridge H Cum on September 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  39.00  from holding Enbridge H Cum or generate 1.96% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Enbridge H Cum  vs.  Maple Leaf Foods

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Enbridge H Cum 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Enbridge H Cum are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong fundamental drivers, Enbridge H is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Maple Leaf Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Maple Leaf Foods has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy forward indicators, Maple Leaf is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Enbridge H and Maple Leaf Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Enbridge H and Maple Leaf

The main advantage of trading using opposite Enbridge H and Maple Leaf positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Enbridge H position performs unexpectedly, Maple Leaf can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Maple Leaf will offset losses from the drop in Maple Leaf's long position.
The idea behind Enbridge H Cum and Maple Leaf Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Manager module to state of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios