Correlation Between Shelton Emerging and Precious Metals

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Shelton Emerging and Precious Metals at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Shelton Emerging and Precious Metals into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Shelton Emerging Markets and Precious Metals Ultrasector, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Shelton Emerging and Precious Metals and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Shelton Emerging with a short position of Precious Metals. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Shelton Emerging and Precious Metals.

Diversification Opportunities for Shelton Emerging and Precious Metals

0.82
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Shelton and Precious is 0.82. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Shelton Emerging Markets and Precious Metals Ultrasector in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Precious Metals Ultr and Shelton Emerging is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Shelton Emerging Markets are associated (or correlated) with Precious Metals. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Precious Metals Ultr has no effect on the direction of Shelton Emerging i.e., Shelton Emerging and Precious Metals go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Shelton Emerging and Precious Metals

Assuming the 90 days horizon Shelton Emerging is expected to generate 12.42 times less return on investment than Precious Metals. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Shelton Emerging Markets is 2.68 times less risky than Precious Metals. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Precious Metals Ultrasector is currently generating about 0.28 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  4,548  in Precious Metals Ultrasector on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,508  from holding Precious Metals Ultrasector or generate 55.15% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Shelton Emerging Markets  vs.  Precious Metals Ultrasector

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Shelton Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Shelton Emerging Markets are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong essential indicators, Shelton Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Precious Metals Ultr 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Precious Metals Ultrasector are ranked lower than 22 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Precious Metals showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Shelton Emerging and Precious Metals Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Shelton Emerging and Precious Metals

The main advantage of trading using opposite Shelton Emerging and Precious Metals positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Shelton Emerging position performs unexpectedly, Precious Metals can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Precious Metals will offset losses from the drop in Precious Metals' long position.
The idea behind Shelton Emerging Markets and Precious Metals Ultrasector pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Diagnostics module to use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios