Correlation Between Ashmore Emerging and Monthly Rebalance

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ashmore Emerging and Monthly Rebalance at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ashmore Emerging and Monthly Rebalance into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ashmore Emerging Markets and Monthly Rebalance Nasdaq 100, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ashmore Emerging and Monthly Rebalance and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ashmore Emerging with a short position of Monthly Rebalance. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ashmore Emerging and Monthly Rebalance.

Diversification Opportunities for Ashmore Emerging and Monthly Rebalance

0.28
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Ashmore and Monthly is 0.28. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ashmore Emerging Markets and Monthly Rebalance Nasdaq 100 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Monthly Rebalance and Ashmore Emerging is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ashmore Emerging Markets are associated (or correlated) with Monthly Rebalance. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Monthly Rebalance has no effect on the direction of Ashmore Emerging i.e., Ashmore Emerging and Monthly Rebalance go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ashmore Emerging and Monthly Rebalance

Assuming the 90 days horizon Ashmore Emerging is expected to generate 17.45 times less return on investment than Monthly Rebalance. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Ashmore Emerging Markets is 20.47 times less risky than Monthly Rebalance. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Monthly Rebalance Nasdaq 100 is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  55,533  in Monthly Rebalance Nasdaq 100 on September 17, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  12,955  from holding Monthly Rebalance Nasdaq 100 or generate 23.33% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Ashmore Emerging Markets  vs.  Monthly Rebalance Nasdaq 100

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Ashmore Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Ashmore Emerging Markets are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Ashmore Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Monthly Rebalance 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Monthly Rebalance Nasdaq 100 are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Monthly Rebalance showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Ashmore Emerging and Monthly Rebalance Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Ashmore Emerging and Monthly Rebalance

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ashmore Emerging and Monthly Rebalance positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ashmore Emerging position performs unexpectedly, Monthly Rebalance can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Monthly Rebalance will offset losses from the drop in Monthly Rebalance's long position.
The idea behind Ashmore Emerging Markets and Monthly Rebalance Nasdaq 100 pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Anywhere module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities