Correlation Between Embassy Office and Procter Gamble

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Embassy Office and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Embassy Office and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Embassy Office Parks and Procter Gamble Health, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Embassy Office and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Embassy Office with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Embassy Office and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Embassy Office and Procter Gamble

-0.21

Correlation Coefficient

Embassy Office  Procter Gamble

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Embassy and Procter is -0.21. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Embassy Office Parks and Procter Gamble Health in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble Health and Embassy Office is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Embassy Office Parks are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble Health has no effect on the direction of Embassy Office i.e., Embassy Office and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Embassy Office and Procter Gamble

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Embassy Office Parks is expected to under-perform the Procter Gamble. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Embassy Office Parks is 1.37 times less risky than Procter Gamble. The stock trades about -0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Procter Gamble Health is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  493,096  in Procter Gamble Health on October 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  58,069  from holding Procter Gamble Health or generate 11.78% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	98.36%
Values	Daily Returns

Embassy Office Parks  vs.  Procter Gamble Health

Embassy Office Parks

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Embassy Office Parks has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest unsteady performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the company investors.

Procter Gamble Health

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble Health are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively unfluctuating basic indicators, Procter Gamble may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.

Pair Trading with Embassy Office and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Embassy Office and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Embassy Office position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.

The idea behind Embassy Office Parks and Procter Gamble Health pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Odds Of Bankruptcy module to get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years.