Correlation Between EM and PING
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both EM and PING at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining EM and PING into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between EM and PING, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on EM and PING and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in EM with a short position of PING. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of EM and PING.
Diversification Opportunities for EM and PING
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between EM and PING is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding EM and PING in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on PING and EM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on EM are associated (or correlated) with PING. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of PING has no effect on the direction of EM i.e., EM and PING go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between EM and PING
If you would invest 5.72 in PING on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding PING or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Flat |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 1.54% |
Values | Daily Returns |
EM vs. PING
Performance |
Timeline |
EM |
PING |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
EM and PING Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with EM and PING
The main advantage of trading using opposite EM and PING positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if EM position performs unexpectedly, PING can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in PING will offset losses from the drop in PING's long position.The idea behind EM and PING pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sign In To Macroaxis module to sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules.
Other Complementary Tools
Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
Analyst Advice Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories | |
Headlines Timeline Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity |