Correlation Between Stone Harbor and Franklin Templeton

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Stone Harbor and Franklin Templeton at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Stone Harbor and Franklin Templeton into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Stone Harbor Emerging and Franklin Templeton Limited, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Stone Harbor and Franklin Templeton and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Stone Harbor with a short position of Franklin Templeton. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Stone Harbor and Franklin Templeton.

Diversification Opportunities for Stone Harbor and Franklin Templeton

0.71

Correlation Coefficient

Stone Harbor  Franklin Templeton

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Stone and Franklin is 0.71. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Stone Harbor Emerging and Franklin Templeton Limited in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Franklin Templeton and Stone Harbor is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Stone Harbor Emerging are associated (or correlated) with Franklin Templeton. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Franklin Templeton has no effect on the direction of Stone Harbor i.e., Stone Harbor and Franklin Templeton go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Stone Harbor and Franklin Templeton

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Stone Harbor Emerging is expected to generate 1.88 times more return on investment than Franklin Templeton. However, Stone Harbor is 1.88 times more volatile than Franklin Templeton Limited. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Franklin Templeton Limited is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  455.00  in Stone Harbor Emerging on December 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  53.00  from holding Stone Harbor Emerging or generate 11.65% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Stone Harbor Emerging  vs.  Franklin Templeton Limited

Stone Harbor Emerging

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Stone Harbor Emerging are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. Despite nearly inconsistent fundamental indicators, Stone Harbor may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2025.

Franklin Templeton

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Franklin Templeton Limited are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Franklin Templeton is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Pair Trading with Stone Harbor and Franklin Templeton

The main advantage of trading using opposite Stone Harbor and Franklin Templeton positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Stone Harbor position performs unexpectedly, Franklin Templeton can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Franklin Templeton will offset losses from the drop in Franklin Templeton's long position.

The idea behind Stone Harbor Emerging and Franklin Templeton Limited pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stocks Directory module to find actively traded stocks across global markets.