Correlation Between Stone Harbor and Cohen Steers

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Stone Harbor and Cohen Steers at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Stone Harbor and Cohen Steers into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Stone Harbor Emerging and Cohen Steers Closed, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Stone Harbor and Cohen Steers and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Stone Harbor with a short position of Cohen Steers. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Stone Harbor and Cohen Steers.

Diversification Opportunities for Stone Harbor and Cohen Steers

-0.23
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Stone and Cohen is -0.23. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Stone Harbor Emerging and Cohen Steers Closed in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cohen Steers Closed and Stone Harbor is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Stone Harbor Emerging are associated (or correlated) with Cohen Steers. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cohen Steers Closed has no effect on the direction of Stone Harbor i.e., Stone Harbor and Cohen Steers go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Stone Harbor and Cohen Steers

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Stone Harbor Emerging is expected to generate 1.47 times more return on investment than Cohen Steers. However, Stone Harbor is 1.47 times more volatile than Cohen Steers Closed. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Cohen Steers Closed is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  469.00  in Stone Harbor Emerging on December 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  49.00  from holding Stone Harbor Emerging or generate 10.45% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Stone Harbor Emerging  vs.  Cohen Steers Closed

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Stone Harbor Emerging 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Stone Harbor Emerging are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. Despite nearly inconsistent fundamental indicators, Stone Harbor may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2025.
Cohen Steers Closed 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Cohen Steers Closed has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Cohen Steers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Stone Harbor and Cohen Steers Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Stone Harbor and Cohen Steers

The main advantage of trading using opposite Stone Harbor and Cohen Steers positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Stone Harbor position performs unexpectedly, Cohen Steers can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cohen Steers will offset losses from the drop in Cohen Steers' long position.
The idea behind Stone Harbor Emerging and Cohen Steers Closed pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules