Correlation Between Diamond Estates and Eli Lilly

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Diamond Estates and Eli Lilly at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Diamond Estates and Eli Lilly into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Diamond Estates Wines and Eli Lilly and, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Diamond Estates and Eli Lilly and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Diamond Estates with a short position of Eli Lilly. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Diamond Estates and Eli Lilly.

Diversification Opportunities for Diamond Estates and Eli Lilly

0.86
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Diamond and Eli is 0.86. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Diamond Estates Wines and Eli Lilly and in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Eli Lilly and Diamond Estates is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Diamond Estates Wines are associated (or correlated) with Eli Lilly. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Eli Lilly has no effect on the direction of Diamond Estates i.e., Diamond Estates and Eli Lilly go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Diamond Estates and Eli Lilly

Assuming the 90 days horizon Diamond Estates Wines is expected to generate 3.35 times more return on investment than Eli Lilly. However, Diamond Estates is 3.35 times more volatile than Eli Lilly and. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Eli Lilly and is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  21.00  in Diamond Estates Wines on September 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1.00  from holding Diamond Estates Wines or generate 4.76% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy95.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

Diamond Estates Wines  vs.  Eli Lilly and

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Diamond Estates Wines 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Diamond Estates Wines has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain fairly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The latest fuss may also be a sign of long-term up-swing for the venture sophisticated investors.
Eli Lilly 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Eli Lilly and has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest abnormal performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain healthy and the recent disarray on Wall Street may also be a sign of long period gains for the firm investors.

Diamond Estates and Eli Lilly Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Diamond Estates and Eli Lilly

The main advantage of trading using opposite Diamond Estates and Eli Lilly positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Diamond Estates position performs unexpectedly, Eli Lilly can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Eli Lilly will offset losses from the drop in Eli Lilly's long position.
The idea behind Diamond Estates Wines and Eli Lilly and pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.

Other Complementary Tools

Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years