Correlation Between Doxa AB and Mantex AB
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Doxa AB and Mantex AB at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Doxa AB and Mantex AB into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Doxa AB and Mantex AB, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Doxa AB and Mantex AB and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Doxa AB with a short position of Mantex AB. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Doxa AB and Mantex AB.
Diversification Opportunities for Doxa AB and Mantex AB
Average diversification
The 3 months correlation between Doxa and Mantex is 0.18. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Doxa AB and Mantex AB in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mantex AB and Doxa AB is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Doxa AB are associated (or correlated) with Mantex AB. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mantex AB has no effect on the direction of Doxa AB i.e., Doxa AB and Mantex AB go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Doxa AB and Mantex AB
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Doxa AB is expected to generate 2.08 times more return on investment than Mantex AB. However, Doxa AB is 2.08 times more volatile than Mantex AB. It trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mantex AB is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest 67.00 in Doxa AB on December 31, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (22.00) from holding Doxa AB or give up 32.84% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Doxa AB vs. Mantex AB
Performance |
Timeline |
Doxa AB |
Mantex AB |
Doxa AB and Mantex AB Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Doxa AB and Mantex AB
The main advantage of trading using opposite Doxa AB and Mantex AB positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Doxa AB position performs unexpectedly, Mantex AB can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mantex AB will offset losses from the drop in Mantex AB's long position.Doxa AB vs. Mantex AB | Doxa AB vs. Genovis AB | Doxa AB vs. Vestum AB | Doxa AB vs. Karolinska Development AB |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stocks Directory module to find actively traded stocks across global markets.
Other Complementary Tools
Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world | |
Headlines Timeline Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity | |
Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals | |
Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data |