Correlation Between Destinations Multi and Guggenheim Managed
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Destinations Multi and Guggenheim Managed at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Destinations Multi and Guggenheim Managed into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Destinations Multi Strategy and Guggenheim Managed Futures, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Destinations Multi and Guggenheim Managed and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Destinations Multi with a short position of Guggenheim Managed. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Destinations Multi and Guggenheim Managed.
Diversification Opportunities for Destinations Multi and Guggenheim Managed
-0.19 | Correlation Coefficient |
Good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Destinations and Guggenheim is -0.19. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Destinations Multi Strategy and Guggenheim Managed Futures in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Guggenheim Managed and Destinations Multi is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Destinations Multi Strategy are associated (or correlated) with Guggenheim Managed. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Guggenheim Managed has no effect on the direction of Destinations Multi i.e., Destinations Multi and Guggenheim Managed go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Destinations Multi and Guggenheim Managed
Assuming the 90 days horizon Destinations Multi Strategy is expected to under-perform the Guggenheim Managed. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Destinations Multi Strategy is 2.93 times less risky than Guggenheim Managed. The mutual fund trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Guggenheim Managed Futures is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 1,918 in Guggenheim Managed Futures on October 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 64.00 from holding Guggenheim Managed Futures or generate 3.34% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Destinations Multi Strategy vs. Guggenheim Managed Futures
Performance |
Timeline |
Destinations Multi |
Guggenheim Managed |
Destinations Multi and Guggenheim Managed Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Destinations Multi and Guggenheim Managed
The main advantage of trading using opposite Destinations Multi and Guggenheim Managed positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Destinations Multi position performs unexpectedly, Guggenheim Managed can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Guggenheim Managed will offset losses from the drop in Guggenheim Managed's long position.The idea behind Destinations Multi Strategy and Guggenheim Managed Futures pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Guggenheim Managed vs. Hussman Strategic Growth | Guggenheim Managed vs. The Arbitrage Fund | Guggenheim Managed vs. Guggenheim Multi Hedge Strategies | Guggenheim Managed vs. The Merger Fund |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.
Other Complementary Tools
Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance | |
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
Sectors List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities | |
Commodity Channel Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum |