Correlation Between Dine Brands and Philip Morris

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Dine Brands and Philip Morris at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Dine Brands and Philip Morris into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Dine Brands Global and Philip Morris International, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Dine Brands and Philip Morris and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Dine Brands with a short position of Philip Morris. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Dine Brands and Philip Morris.

Diversification Opportunities for Dine Brands and Philip Morris

0.23
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Dine and Philip is 0.23. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Dine Brands Global and Philip Morris International in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Philip Morris Intern and Dine Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Dine Brands Global are associated (or correlated) with Philip Morris. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Philip Morris Intern has no effect on the direction of Dine Brands i.e., Dine Brands and Philip Morris go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Dine Brands and Philip Morris

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Dine Brands Global is expected to under-perform the Philip Morris. In addition to that, Dine Brands is 2.09 times more volatile than Philip Morris International. It trades about -0.25 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Philip Morris International is currently generating about -0.23 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  13,071  in Philip Morris International on September 24, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (649.00) from holding Philip Morris International or give up 4.97% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Dine Brands Global  vs.  Philip Morris International

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Dine Brands Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Dine Brands Global are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy forward indicators, Dine Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Philip Morris Intern 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Philip Morris International are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy primary indicators, Philip Morris is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Dine Brands and Philip Morris Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Dine Brands and Philip Morris

The main advantage of trading using opposite Dine Brands and Philip Morris positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Dine Brands position performs unexpectedly, Philip Morris can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Philip Morris will offset losses from the drop in Philip Morris' long position.
The idea behind Dine Brands Global and Philip Morris International pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance