Correlation Between Dine Brands and Levi Strauss

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Dine Brands and Levi Strauss at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Dine Brands and Levi Strauss into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Dine Brands Global and Levi Strauss Co, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Dine Brands and Levi Strauss and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Dine Brands with a short position of Levi Strauss. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Dine Brands and Levi Strauss.

Diversification Opportunities for Dine Brands and Levi Strauss

0.41
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Dine and Levi is 0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Dine Brands Global and Levi Strauss Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Levi Strauss and Dine Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Dine Brands Global are associated (or correlated) with Levi Strauss. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Levi Strauss has no effect on the direction of Dine Brands i.e., Dine Brands and Levi Strauss go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Dine Brands and Levi Strauss

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Dine Brands Global is expected to under-perform the Levi Strauss. In addition to that, Dine Brands is 1.39 times more volatile than Levi Strauss Co. It trades about -0.1 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Levi Strauss Co is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,706  in Levi Strauss Co on December 27, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (97.00) from holding Levi Strauss Co or give up 5.69% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Dine Brands Global  vs.  Levi Strauss Co

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Dine Brands Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Dine Brands Global has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's forward indicators remain very healthy which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The recent disarray may also be a sign of long period up-swing for the firm investors.
Levi Strauss 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Levi Strauss Co has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fairly strong basic indicators, Levi Strauss is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price confusion, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the traders.

Dine Brands and Levi Strauss Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Dine Brands and Levi Strauss

The main advantage of trading using opposite Dine Brands and Levi Strauss positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Dine Brands position performs unexpectedly, Levi Strauss can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Levi Strauss will offset losses from the drop in Levi Strauss' long position.
The idea behind Dine Brands Global and Levi Strauss Co pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.

Other Complementary Tools

ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets