Correlation Between Dine Brands and Juniata Valley

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Dine Brands and Juniata Valley at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Dine Brands and Juniata Valley into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Dine Brands Global and Juniata Valley Financial, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Dine Brands and Juniata Valley and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Dine Brands with a short position of Juniata Valley. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Dine Brands and Juniata Valley.

Diversification Opportunities for Dine Brands and Juniata Valley

-0.02
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Dine and Juniata is -0.02. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Dine Brands Global and Juniata Valley Financial in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Juniata Valley Financial and Dine Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Dine Brands Global are associated (or correlated) with Juniata Valley. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Juniata Valley Financial has no effect on the direction of Dine Brands i.e., Dine Brands and Juniata Valley go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Dine Brands and Juniata Valley

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Dine Brands Global is expected to under-perform the Juniata Valley. In addition to that, Dine Brands is 1.1 times more volatile than Juniata Valley Financial. It trades about -0.09 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Juniata Valley Financial is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,303  in Juniata Valley Financial on December 28, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (53.00) from holding Juniata Valley Financial or give up 4.07% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Dine Brands Global  vs.  Juniata Valley Financial

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Dine Brands Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Dine Brands Global has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's forward indicators remain very healthy which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The recent disarray may also be a sign of long period up-swing for the firm investors.
Juniata Valley Financial 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Juniata Valley Financial has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Juniata Valley is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Dine Brands and Juniata Valley Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Dine Brands and Juniata Valley

The main advantage of trading using opposite Dine Brands and Juniata Valley positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Dine Brands position performs unexpectedly, Juniata Valley can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Juniata Valley will offset losses from the drop in Juniata Valley's long position.
The idea behind Dine Brands Global and Juniata Valley Financial pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk