Correlation Between Dine Brands and Hudson Pacific
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Dine Brands and Hudson Pacific at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Dine Brands and Hudson Pacific into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Dine Brands Global and Hudson Pacific Properties, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Dine Brands and Hudson Pacific and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Dine Brands with a short position of Hudson Pacific. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Dine Brands and Hudson Pacific.
Diversification Opportunities for Dine Brands and Hudson Pacific
-0.44 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Dine and Hudson is -0.44. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Dine Brands Global and Hudson Pacific Properties in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Hudson Pacific Properties and Dine Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Dine Brands Global are associated (or correlated) with Hudson Pacific. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Hudson Pacific Properties has no effect on the direction of Dine Brands i.e., Dine Brands and Hudson Pacific go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Dine Brands and Hudson Pacific
Considering the 90-day investment horizon Dine Brands Global is expected to generate 0.82 times more return on investment than Hudson Pacific. However, Dine Brands Global is 1.22 times less risky than Hudson Pacific. It trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Hudson Pacific Properties is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest 3,620 in Dine Brands Global on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (504.00) from holding Dine Brands Global or give up 13.92% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Dine Brands Global vs. Hudson Pacific Properties
Performance |
Timeline |
Dine Brands Global |
Hudson Pacific Properties |
Dine Brands and Hudson Pacific Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Dine Brands and Hudson Pacific
The main advantage of trading using opposite Dine Brands and Hudson Pacific positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Dine Brands position performs unexpectedly, Hudson Pacific can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Hudson Pacific will offset losses from the drop in Hudson Pacific's long position.The idea behind Dine Brands Global and Hudson Pacific Properties pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.Hudson Pacific vs. Boston Properties | Hudson Pacific vs. Douglas Emmett | Hudson Pacific vs. Alexandria Real Estate | Hudson Pacific vs. Vornado Realty Trust |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Volatility module to check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk.
Other Complementary Tools
Portfolio File Import Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format | |
Price Ceiling Movement Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments | |
Headlines Timeline Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity | |
Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
Share Portfolio Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device |