Correlation Between Dine Brands and Highest Performances

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Dine Brands and Highest Performances at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Dine Brands and Highest Performances into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Dine Brands Global and Highest Performances Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Dine Brands and Highest Performances and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Dine Brands with a short position of Highest Performances. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Dine Brands and Highest Performances.

Diversification Opportunities for Dine Brands and Highest Performances

0.71
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Dine and Highest is 0.71. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Dine Brands Global and Highest Performances Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Highest Performances and Dine Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Dine Brands Global are associated (or correlated) with Highest Performances. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Highest Performances has no effect on the direction of Dine Brands i.e., Dine Brands and Highest Performances go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Dine Brands and Highest Performances

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Dine Brands Global is expected to generate 0.31 times more return on investment than Highest Performances. However, Dine Brands Global is 3.18 times less risky than Highest Performances. It trades about -0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Highest Performances Holdings is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,858  in Dine Brands Global on December 18, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (416.00) from holding Dine Brands Global or give up 14.56% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy98.33%
ValuesDaily Returns

Dine Brands Global  vs.  Highest Performances Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Dine Brands Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Dine Brands Global has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's forward indicators remain very healthy which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The recent disarray may also be a sign of long period up-swing for the firm investors.
Highest Performances 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Highest Performances Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The recent confusion may also be a sign of long-lasting up-swing for the firm traders.

Dine Brands and Highest Performances Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Dine Brands and Highest Performances

The main advantage of trading using opposite Dine Brands and Highest Performances positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Dine Brands position performs unexpectedly, Highest Performances can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Highest Performances will offset losses from the drop in Highest Performances' long position.
The idea behind Dine Brands Global and Highest Performances Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bond Analysis module to evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios..

Other Complementary Tools

ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device