Correlation Between Dine Brands and Good Life
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Dine Brands and Good Life at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Dine Brands and Good Life into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Dine Brands Global and Good Life China, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Dine Brands and Good Life and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Dine Brands with a short position of Good Life. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Dine Brands and Good Life.
Diversification Opportunities for Dine Brands and Good Life
0.0 | Correlation Coefficient |
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Dine and Good is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Dine Brands Global and Good Life China in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Good Life China and Dine Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Dine Brands Global are associated (or correlated) with Good Life. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Good Life China has no effect on the direction of Dine Brands i.e., Dine Brands and Good Life go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Dine Brands and Good Life
If you would invest 0.00 in Good Life China on December 19, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding Good Life China or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Flat |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 95.16% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Dine Brands Global vs. Good Life China
Performance |
Timeline |
Dine Brands Global |
Good Life China |
Dine Brands and Good Life Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Dine Brands and Good Life
The main advantage of trading using opposite Dine Brands and Good Life positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Dine Brands position performs unexpectedly, Good Life can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Good Life will offset losses from the drop in Good Life's long position.Dine Brands vs. Bloomin Brands | Dine Brands vs. BJs Restaurants | Dine Brands vs. The Cheesecake Factory | Dine Brands vs. Brinker International |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.
Other Complementary Tools
Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
Portfolio Dashboard Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments | |
Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets | |
Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. | |
Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance |