Correlation Between Franklin Templeton and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Franklin Templeton and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Franklin Templeton and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Franklin Templeton ETF and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Franklin Templeton and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Franklin Templeton with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Franklin Templeton and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Franklin Templeton and Goldman Sachs

0.82
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Franklin and Goldman is 0.82. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Franklin Templeton ETF and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta and Franklin Templeton is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Franklin Templeton ETF are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta has no effect on the direction of Franklin Templeton i.e., Franklin Templeton and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Franklin Templeton and Goldman Sachs

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Franklin Templeton is expected to generate 2.0 times less return on investment than Goldman Sachs. In addition to that, Franklin Templeton is 1.04 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta. It trades about 0.08 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta is currently generating about 0.16 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  3,319  in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta on December 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  279.00  from holding Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta or generate 8.41% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Franklin Templeton ETF  vs.  Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Franklin Templeton ETF 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Franklin Templeton ETF are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy technical and fundamental indicators, Franklin Templeton is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather weak forward indicators, Goldman Sachs may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2025.

Franklin Templeton and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Franklin Templeton and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Franklin Templeton and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Franklin Templeton position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Franklin Templeton ETF and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Premium Stories module to follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine