Correlation Between De Grey and Sports Entertainment

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both De Grey and Sports Entertainment at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining De Grey and Sports Entertainment into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between De Grey Mining and Sports Entertainment Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on De Grey and Sports Entertainment and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in De Grey with a short position of Sports Entertainment. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of De Grey and Sports Entertainment.

Diversification Opportunities for De Grey and Sports Entertainment

-0.63
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between DEG and Sports is -0.63. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding De Grey Mining and Sports Entertainment Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sports Entertainment and De Grey is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on De Grey Mining are associated (or correlated) with Sports Entertainment. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sports Entertainment has no effect on the direction of De Grey i.e., De Grey and Sports Entertainment go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between De Grey and Sports Entertainment

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon De Grey Mining is expected to under-perform the Sports Entertainment. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, De Grey Mining is 3.16 times less risky than Sports Entertainment. The stock trades about -0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Sports Entertainment Group is currently generating about 0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  23.00  in Sports Entertainment Group on October 9, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.00  from holding Sports Entertainment Group or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

De Grey Mining  vs.  Sports Entertainment Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
De Grey Mining 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in De Grey Mining are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, De Grey unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Sports Entertainment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Sports Entertainment Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

De Grey and Sports Entertainment Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with De Grey and Sports Entertainment

The main advantage of trading using opposite De Grey and Sports Entertainment positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if De Grey position performs unexpectedly, Sports Entertainment can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sports Entertainment will offset losses from the drop in Sports Entertainment's long position.
The idea behind De Grey Mining and Sports Entertainment Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm