Correlation Between Curtiss Wright and Rolls-Royce Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Curtiss Wright and Rolls-Royce Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Curtiss Wright and Rolls-Royce Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Curtiss Wright and Rolls Royce Holdings plc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Curtiss Wright and Rolls-Royce Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Curtiss Wright with a short position of Rolls-Royce Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Curtiss Wright and Rolls-Royce Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for Curtiss Wright and Rolls-Royce Holdings

-0.54
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Curtiss and Rolls-Royce is -0.54. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Curtiss Wright and Rolls Royce Holdings plc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Rolls Royce Holdings and Curtiss Wright is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Curtiss Wright are associated (or correlated) with Rolls-Royce Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Rolls Royce Holdings has no effect on the direction of Curtiss Wright i.e., Curtiss Wright and Rolls-Royce Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Curtiss Wright and Rolls-Royce Holdings

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Curtiss Wright is expected to under-perform the Rolls-Royce Holdings. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Curtiss Wright is 2.57 times less risky than Rolls-Royce Holdings. The stock trades about -0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Rolls Royce Holdings plc is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  0.30  in Rolls Royce Holdings plc on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.09  from holding Rolls Royce Holdings plc or generate 30.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy98.41%
ValuesDaily Returns

Curtiss Wright  vs.  Rolls Royce Holdings plc

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Curtiss Wright 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Curtiss Wright has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest weak performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the latest fuss on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-term gains for the venture sophisticated investors.
Rolls Royce Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Rolls Royce Holdings plc are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile fundamental indicators, Rolls-Royce Holdings reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Curtiss Wright and Rolls-Royce Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Curtiss Wright and Rolls-Royce Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite Curtiss Wright and Rolls-Royce Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Curtiss Wright position performs unexpectedly, Rolls-Royce Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Rolls-Royce Holdings will offset losses from the drop in Rolls-Royce Holdings' long position.
The idea behind Curtiss Wright and Rolls Royce Holdings plc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Dashboard module to portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets