Correlation Between Cohen Steers and Alpine Global

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cohen Steers and Alpine Global at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cohen Steers and Alpine Global into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cohen Steers Global and Alpine Global Infrastructure, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cohen Steers and Alpine Global and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cohen Steers with a short position of Alpine Global. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cohen Steers and Alpine Global.

Diversification Opportunities for Cohen Steers and Alpine Global

0.69
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cohen and Alpine is 0.69. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cohen Steers Global and Alpine Global Infrastructure in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Alpine Global Infras and Cohen Steers is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cohen Steers Global are associated (or correlated) with Alpine Global. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Alpine Global Infras has no effect on the direction of Cohen Steers i.e., Cohen Steers and Alpine Global go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cohen Steers and Alpine Global

Assuming the 90 days horizon Cohen Steers Global is expected to under-perform the Alpine Global. In addition to that, Cohen Steers is 1.3 times more volatile than Alpine Global Infrastructure. It trades about -0.05 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Alpine Global Infrastructure is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,425  in Alpine Global Infrastructure on September 6, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (6.00) from holding Alpine Global Infrastructure or give up 0.25% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cohen Steers Global  vs.  Alpine Global Infrastructure

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cohen Steers Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Cohen Steers Global has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Cohen Steers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Alpine Global Infras 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Alpine Global Infrastructure has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Alpine Global is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Cohen Steers and Alpine Global Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cohen Steers and Alpine Global

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cohen Steers and Alpine Global positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cohen Steers position performs unexpectedly, Alpine Global can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Alpine Global will offset losses from the drop in Alpine Global's long position.
The idea behind Cohen Steers Global and Alpine Global Infrastructure pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Technical Analysis module to check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data.

Other Complementary Tools

Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance