Correlation Between Cisco Systems and KINDER

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cisco Systems and KINDER at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cisco Systems and KINDER into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cisco Systems and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cisco Systems and KINDER and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cisco Systems with a short position of KINDER. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cisco Systems and KINDER.

Diversification Opportunities for Cisco Systems and KINDER

-0.52
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cisco and KINDER is -0.52. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cisco Systems and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and Cisco Systems is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cisco Systems are associated (or correlated) with KINDER. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has no effect on the direction of Cisco Systems i.e., Cisco Systems and KINDER go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cisco Systems and KINDER

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Cisco Systems is expected to generate 1.15 times more return on investment than KINDER. However, Cisco Systems is 1.15 times more volatile than KINDER MORGAN ENERGY. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. KINDER MORGAN ENERGY is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,871  in Cisco Systems on October 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,039  from holding Cisco Systems or generate 21.33% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy77.82%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cisco Systems  vs.  KINDER MORGAN ENERGY

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cisco Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cisco Systems are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak fundamental indicators, Cisco Systems may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in KINDER MORGAN ENERGY are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, KINDER is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Cisco Systems and KINDER Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cisco Systems and KINDER

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cisco Systems and KINDER positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cisco Systems position performs unexpectedly, KINDER can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in KINDER will offset losses from the drop in KINDER's long position.
The idea behind Cisco Systems and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities