Correlation Between Cisco Systems and MCF Energy

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cisco Systems and MCF Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cisco Systems and MCF Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cisco Systems and MCF Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cisco Systems and MCF Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cisco Systems with a short position of MCF Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cisco Systems and MCF Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Cisco Systems and MCF Energy

0.7
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cisco and MCF is 0.7. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cisco Systems and MCF Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on MCF Energy and Cisco Systems is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cisco Systems are associated (or correlated) with MCF Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of MCF Energy has no effect on the direction of Cisco Systems i.e., Cisco Systems and MCF Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cisco Systems and MCF Energy

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Cisco Systems is expected to generate 2.83 times less return on investment than MCF Energy. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Cisco Systems is 7.14 times less risky than MCF Energy. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. MCF Energy is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  4.62  in MCF Energy on December 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.38  from holding MCF Energy or generate 8.23% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cisco Systems  vs.  MCF Energy

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cisco Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cisco Systems are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak fundamental indicators, Cisco Systems may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2025.
MCF Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in MCF Energy are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly weak basic indicators, MCF Energy reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Cisco Systems and MCF Energy Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cisco Systems and MCF Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cisco Systems and MCF Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cisco Systems position performs unexpectedly, MCF Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in MCF Energy will offset losses from the drop in MCF Energy's long position.
The idea behind Cisco Systems and MCF Energy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Search module to search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity