Correlation Between Cisco Systems and Labrador Iron

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cisco Systems and Labrador Iron at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cisco Systems and Labrador Iron into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cisco Systems and Labrador Iron Ore, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cisco Systems and Labrador Iron and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cisco Systems with a short position of Labrador Iron. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cisco Systems and Labrador Iron.

Diversification Opportunities for Cisco Systems and Labrador Iron

-0.89
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Cisco and Labrador is -0.89. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cisco Systems and Labrador Iron Ore in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Labrador Iron Ore and Cisco Systems is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cisco Systems are associated (or correlated) with Labrador Iron. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Labrador Iron Ore has no effect on the direction of Cisco Systems i.e., Cisco Systems and Labrador Iron go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cisco Systems and Labrador Iron

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Cisco Systems is expected to generate 0.64 times more return on investment than Labrador Iron. However, Cisco Systems is 1.55 times less risky than Labrador Iron. It trades about -0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Labrador Iron Ore is currently generating about -0.15 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,948  in Cisco Systems on October 7, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (62.00) from holding Cisco Systems or give up 1.04% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cisco Systems  vs.  Labrador Iron Ore

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cisco Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cisco Systems are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very inconsistent fundamental indicators, Cisco Systems may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.
Labrador Iron Ore 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Labrador Iron Ore has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Cisco Systems and Labrador Iron Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cisco Systems and Labrador Iron

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cisco Systems and Labrador Iron positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cisco Systems position performs unexpectedly, Labrador Iron can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Labrador Iron will offset losses from the drop in Labrador Iron's long position.
The idea behind Cisco Systems and Labrador Iron Ore pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Manager module to state of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital.

Other Complementary Tools

Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories