Correlation Between Cisco Systems and JPMorgan Quality

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cisco Systems and JPMorgan Quality at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cisco Systems and JPMorgan Quality into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cisco Systems and JPMorgan Quality Factor, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cisco Systems and JPMorgan Quality and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cisco Systems with a short position of JPMorgan Quality. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cisco Systems and JPMorgan Quality.

Diversification Opportunities for Cisco Systems and JPMorgan Quality

0.6

Correlation Coefficient

Cisco Systems  JPMorgan Quality

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cisco and JPMorgan is 0.6. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cisco Systems and JPMorgan Quality Factor in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on JPMorgan Quality Factor and Cisco Systems is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cisco Systems are associated (or correlated) with JPMorgan Quality. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of JPMorgan Quality Factor has no effect on the direction of Cisco Systems i.e., Cisco Systems and JPMorgan Quality go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cisco Systems and JPMorgan Quality

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Cisco Systems is expected to generate 1.45 times more return on investment than JPMorgan Quality. However, Cisco Systems is 1.45 times more volatile than JPMorgan Quality Factor. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. JPMorgan Quality Factor is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,879  in Cisco Systems on December 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  261.00  from holding Cisco Systems or generate 4.44% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Cisco Systems  vs.  JPMorgan Quality Factor

Cisco Systems

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cisco Systems are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy fundamental indicators, Cisco Systems is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

JPMorgan Quality Factor

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days JPMorgan Quality Factor has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, JPMorgan Quality is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Cisco Systems and JPMorgan Quality

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cisco Systems and JPMorgan Quality positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cisco Systems position performs unexpectedly, JPMorgan Quality can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in JPMorgan Quality will offset losses from the drop in JPMorgan Quality's long position.

The idea behind Cisco Systems and JPMorgan Quality Factor pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.