Correlation Between Salesforce and Maple Leaf

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Salesforce and Maple Leaf at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Salesforce and Maple Leaf into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between SalesforceCom CDR and Maple Leaf Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Salesforce and Maple Leaf and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Salesforce with a short position of Maple Leaf. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Salesforce and Maple Leaf.

Diversification Opportunities for Salesforce and Maple Leaf

0.07
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Salesforce and Maple is 0.07. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding SalesforceCom CDR and Maple Leaf Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Maple Leaf Foods and Salesforce is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on SalesforceCom CDR are associated (or correlated) with Maple Leaf. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Maple Leaf Foods has no effect on the direction of Salesforce i.e., Salesforce and Maple Leaf go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Salesforce and Maple Leaf

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon SalesforceCom CDR is expected to under-perform the Maple Leaf. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, SalesforceCom CDR is 1.62 times less risky than Maple Leaf. The stock trades about -0.43 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Maple Leaf Foods is currently generating about -0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,219  in Maple Leaf Foods on October 13, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (38.00) from holding Maple Leaf Foods or give up 1.71% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

SalesforceCom CDR  vs.  Maple Leaf Foods

 Performance 
       Timeline  
SalesforceCom CDR 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in SalesforceCom CDR are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating basic indicators, Salesforce may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.
Maple Leaf Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Maple Leaf Foods has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy forward indicators, Maple Leaf is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Salesforce and Maple Leaf Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Salesforce and Maple Leaf

The main advantage of trading using opposite Salesforce and Maple Leaf positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Salesforce position performs unexpectedly, Maple Leaf can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Maple Leaf will offset losses from the drop in Maple Leaf's long position.
The idea behind SalesforceCom CDR and Maple Leaf Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated