Correlation Between Cirmaker Technology and PennantPark Floating
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cirmaker Technology and PennantPark Floating at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cirmaker Technology and PennantPark Floating into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cirmaker Technology and PennantPark Floating Rate, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cirmaker Technology and PennantPark Floating and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cirmaker Technology with a short position of PennantPark Floating. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cirmaker Technology and PennantPark Floating.
Diversification Opportunities for Cirmaker Technology and PennantPark Floating
0.71 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Cirmaker and PennantPark is 0.71. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cirmaker Technology and PennantPark Floating Rate in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on PennantPark Floating Rate and Cirmaker Technology is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cirmaker Technology are associated (or correlated) with PennantPark Floating. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of PennantPark Floating Rate has no effect on the direction of Cirmaker Technology i.e., Cirmaker Technology and PennantPark Floating go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Cirmaker Technology and PennantPark Floating
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Cirmaker Technology is expected to under-perform the PennantPark Floating. In addition to that, Cirmaker Technology is 4.9 times more volatile than PennantPark Floating Rate. It trades about -0.02 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. PennantPark Floating Rate is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 1,136 in PennantPark Floating Rate on October 10, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (33.00) from holding PennantPark Floating Rate or give up 2.9% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 98.39% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Cirmaker Technology vs. PennantPark Floating Rate
Performance |
Timeline |
Cirmaker Technology |
PennantPark Floating Rate |
Cirmaker Technology and PennantPark Floating Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Cirmaker Technology and PennantPark Floating
The main advantage of trading using opposite Cirmaker Technology and PennantPark Floating positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cirmaker Technology position performs unexpectedly, PennantPark Floating can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in PennantPark Floating will offset losses from the drop in PennantPark Floating's long position.Cirmaker Technology vs. JetBlue Airways Corp | Cirmaker Technology vs. Canlan Ice Sports | Cirmaker Technology vs. Glorywin Entertainment Group | Cirmaker Technology vs. Flutter Entertainment plc |
PennantPark Floating vs. Gladstone Investment | PennantPark Floating vs. Horizon Technology Finance | PennantPark Floating vs. Stellus Capital Investment | PennantPark Floating vs. Prospect Capital |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.
Other Complementary Tools
Equity Analysis Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world |