Correlation Between Conquest Resources and Maple Leaf

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Conquest Resources and Maple Leaf at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Conquest Resources and Maple Leaf into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Conquest Resources and Maple Leaf Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Conquest Resources and Maple Leaf and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Conquest Resources with a short position of Maple Leaf. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Conquest Resources and Maple Leaf.

Diversification Opportunities for Conquest Resources and Maple Leaf

-0.16
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Conquest and Maple is -0.16. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Conquest Resources and Maple Leaf Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Maple Leaf Foods and Conquest Resources is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Conquest Resources are associated (or correlated) with Maple Leaf. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Maple Leaf Foods has no effect on the direction of Conquest Resources i.e., Conquest Resources and Maple Leaf go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Conquest Resources and Maple Leaf

Assuming the 90 days horizon Conquest Resources is expected to generate 6.14 times more return on investment than Maple Leaf. However, Conquest Resources is 6.14 times more volatile than Maple Leaf Foods. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Maple Leaf Foods is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2.00  in Conquest Resources on September 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.00  from holding Conquest Resources or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Conquest Resources  vs.  Maple Leaf Foods

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Conquest Resources 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Conquest Resources has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly stable basic indicators, Conquest Resources is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price fuss, may contribute to near-short-term losses for the sophisticated investors.
Maple Leaf Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Maple Leaf Foods has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest unfluctuating performance, the Stock's forward indicators remain healthy and the recent disarray on Wall Street may also be a sign of long period gains for the firm investors.

Conquest Resources and Maple Leaf Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Conquest Resources and Maple Leaf

The main advantage of trading using opposite Conquest Resources and Maple Leaf positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Conquest Resources position performs unexpectedly, Maple Leaf can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Maple Leaf will offset losses from the drop in Maple Leaf's long position.
The idea behind Conquest Resources and Maple Leaf Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity